星期四, 二月 05, 2009

Bookmark and Share  (20) 则留言

变天何价? 谁是大赢家?

PoliBug | 波力拔克

, ,

三个半民联议员跳槽,倾覆了霹雳州政权,八方兴起讨伐之声,就连国阵营内,也是褒贬不一,到底出了什么状况?

有公正党的支持者为不知如何自处的安华缓颜,神化安公子去年来势汹汹却又无疾而终的跳槽变天计划;也有分不到好处的末代皇孙高呛国阵当选民「傻仔」,以求乘机「博蒙」,捞些廉价本钱;到底安华是否真的如此「神圣」?国阵又是否真的如此「邪恶」?一时成了坊间议论纷纷的话题。

回顾整件事的因果,先是巫统党选造就的内部矛盾,促使跨栏高手纳沙率先变节,紧接着传出纳吉反击,强扯两名尚自官司在身的公正党议员过档,再来自称饱受打压的火箭资深领袖,兼州议会副议长连同此二人先后失踪,民联至此惊觉兵变,使出预签辞呈的绝招,不料选委会不吃这一套,而苏丹的态度似乎是:正义,永远在胜利的这一方。

在两名公正党议员主动反击,否定辞职之后,许月凤也跟着粗了胆,直接投奔国阵营地报到,纳沙见势头不对,荒忙收拾了包袱赶回家来吃团圆饭;纳吉乐得笑呵呵,即刻召开记者会宣布政权回收,一场闹剧,暂时划上分号。

至此,民联怎堪打击?为了不做未满周岁的州务大臣及高级和低级行政议员,民联众将率领兵卒,左一句「卑鄙」,右一句「下流」的开骂,尼查除了炮轰纳吉违宪,更将整粒球踢到苏丹脚底下,充份考验他的智慧。

波力不禁在想,民联支持者言之凿凿,正义凛然,一口否定了跳槽变天的合法性,然而当初安华明目张胆,准备以完全相同的手法篡位之时,这些人又做何想?是否安华挖角就叫「道德」,国阵以这些脱党的独立人士合组政府就叫「无耻」?国阵的议员跳槽就叫「弃暗投明」,绝对和利益扯不上关系,而民联的议员跳槽就叫「为金钱出卖灵魂,卑贱无耻之极」?如果政治手段有道德层次之分,那如此极端的标准,也未免太过荒谬了。

三个半议员当中,一个是和家长赌气而不认亲爹,不是因为认同国阵斗争路线而趋附的过档户;两个是早前国阵自个儿咬定贪赃枉法的待刑之身,最后半个更绝,正是昨天才登报脱离父子关系,今天看到分家产,便急忙赶着回来认祖归宗的败家子!说实在的,跳槽变天即便不违法,国阵的党品却也未免太没格了,堂堂全国最大党,竟然落得要与如此人物滥交共济,得了天下却失了水准,实在惨绝人寰!

早前民行在霹雳虽然一次过囊获18个州议席,成为该州执政阵线的最大政党,却依然改变不了丑陋的种族和宗教歧视,给自爽的人民扇了一个大巴掌,上了宝贵的一课;如今火箭虽然依旧独立坐拥17个席位,但却因为伙伴政党中两个不成器的材料,及自家宝贝的临门一脚,断送了全部家当!让人愤愤不平,那是想当然耳的事!

只不过,除了漫骂,民行领导及党众是否也该自我反思一下,为何位极人臣的资深议员,也会忍无可忍,断然离去?难道又只能归咎于金钱或其他利益的诱惑?想来也不是这么简单吧?

至于马华,仅剩一人大军的州议员阵容,在知道许月凤心生去意之后,第一个反应就是门户大开,却未曾从民心动向作考量,说难听些,今天就算多了一个许月凤,难不成马华就真的能在霹州重振雄风?冰冻三尺,岂是一日之寒可就?许月凤的过档尚未知是福气还是祸害,但是不思在基础上用功,恁一个跳槽怨妇便欣喜若狂的恣态,却已教人沮丧。

在公正党方面,即不能向急转王倪可汉学习,面不红、眼不眨的马上改称两位前阵线代表「贪污腐败」,又无法面对同伙投来鄙夷的眼光,毕竟出了事的正是自家门生,或许安华惟一感到庆幸的是,不同品种的青蛙,行动党也养了一只。

结果,全党上下,手足乏力,只能不着边际的往程序上着眼,说些毫无助益的气话。明眼人都看得出,公正党真的慌了!乌合之众,果然容易失了方寸,靠安公子一家,外挂一个蔡添强,小小惊变尚且应付不了,还怎能托付国家大事?

整件事情倒是让我们看到了回教党优秀的一面,在最紧张的时刻,也只有尼查一人,懂得从最为关键的权力源着手,抓紧苏丹不放,当机立断,在极点处找生机,从法律原则上寻出路,确有大将之风!

回教党毕竟当惯执政党,除了知道如何应用管道及资源,还深切了解苏丹无法背负「纵容动乱之罪」的包袱,在报备法律程序之余,尼查还即刻策动一项可怕的十万人声援大会;说是声援,实则煽动民情,造就示威!

十万人当然不是一个易与的数目,和平过渡?已几成国阵不可能的任务,尼查深知必须通过极为危险的手段,方有望打动苏丹的圣者仁心,对于危机处理,回教党果然有一套,当初民联推举尼查出任大臣,算是做对了!但如此手法,算不算好?

人民绝不应纵容党魁以「预签辞职信」威胁代议士的恶行,议员亦不应妄顾民众投选其代表政党的意愿!然而,拉拢跳槽以求谋夺政权的作法,更不可取!管他是国阵还是民联,都一样的可恶!

一宗变天案,带出各个政党丑陋不堪的一面,接下来搬演的戏码,无论是变天或是改选,对人民、国家及民主进程,都只有伤害,没有建设!各方都讨不了半分好处,而人民,权充陪葬之物。


20 Responses to "变天何价? 谁是大赢家?"
trevortan said :
2009年2月5日 上午10:30
句句珠玑,真知灼见。您的文章,真是一篇比一篇精彩!
州官放火没问题,百姓点灯就卑鄙。
916响臭屁,204小胜利?
天涯客 said :
2009年2月5日 上午11:00
本来就是错的事情,以前因为是自己喜欢的人做的,就说是对的,说是为了民主进程;现在是自己不喜欢的人做的,就是错的,就是十恶不赦的大罪!这是什么歪道理%×$标准?
波力兄,照妖镜显灵了!
oic said :
2009年2月5日 下午2:42
oic said :2009年2月3日 下午2:54
I have some doubts in mind about the defections happen recently in Perak,maybe u guys able to enlightent me.
1.Isn't these defections unethical ?
2.Why these frogs were elected ? Because who they are or because which party they represent ?
3.Honestly,I believe this 2 PKR men are getting $ for doing that,Do u ?
4.If we really respect those people who voted them in 308,shall we let them decide if they support the defection ?
PoliBug | 波力拔克 said :2009年2月3日 下午5:55
oic,
as my limited knowledge, here are my opinions:

1. Party-hopping cause by money entice is unethical, defection with political dreamboat is not.

2. They were elected because of which party they represent or the party on their opposite?

3. Same, but no proof.

4. It might judge by rakyat, but not a pre-signed resignation letter.
oic said :
2009年2月5日 下午2:56
polibug,
I appreciate for your opinion sharing,actually u did enlightented me at Q2,yes,I thought I am a supporter for PR,in fact I am just a normal rakyat that dare to say no to BN today,particulary UMNO.Please tell me if u have to choose only either to eat an rotten apple or an sour orange to survive,what is your choice ? rgds
2009年2月5日 下午3:27
oic,
Frankly Speaking, i have hyperacidity, maybe an sour orange will cause me die faster... cut off those rotten part of apple should be a better way for my case.
oic said :
2009年2月5日 下午3:36
Polibug,
For the people like me who oppose BN is not necessary an Anwar supporter,and most of those who casted their vote for PR in 308 are from my category,we are not blind although we used to be mute,we all know what's the result if there is a snap election in Perak,ofcoz it might cost a lot of $,but people won't care about it,they know they won't starve to dead for that,in fact there will be millions of ringgit injected into Perak,min Rm300 a vote,its going to be a huge amount in total.A pre-cross BN vote exchange for Rm300 will only add another void vote,people will add another cross on the vote.
oic said :
2009年2月5日 下午3:40
polibug,
there won't be much left if u cut off the rotten part,u will starve to dead.
oic said :
2009年2月5日 下午3:48
Polibug,
Do u mean that MCA should leave BN ?
2009年2月5日 下午4:26
undeniable, MCA is a mono-ethnic party in fact, i don't think it can be stand alone without any political partner, means it's still not a good time for MCA to leave BN currently, but can be a option.
oic said :
2009年2月5日 下午4:45
Its sad to hear from u that MCA can't survive on its own,MCA doesn't exist only today ! How can u stay along with a partner that rape and rob your own ethnic while you consider yourself as a mono-ethnic party ?
2009年2月5日 下午5:10
oic,
except MCA, may i know which party else concerned about chinese in malaysia now?

it's not because of MCA can't survive on its own, but BN can be a better multi-racial platform for discussion.

the only thing is, current MCA leader not dare to do so! it's not the party's fault.

"leaving" must be a method but not a token.

(p/s: i have to offline for 4 hours driving, sorry for can't interact with u on time.)
oic said :
2009年2月5日 下午5:59
Polibug,
Do u really think that MCA is the only party in our nation that concern about chinese ? Anyway,u want some names,here they are,DAP,SAPP,LDP.

BN is a platform for multi-racial discussion ? I suggest that its more like a platform for UMNO to give his order to the its 'fellow comrade'!Ahmad Ismail case proved that.

I know OTK is not in u guys favour,why he is elected ? Phantom's vote ? He paid like Najis just did ? If he play dirty,tell me,if he didn't, it means MCA wants him to be the one to decide,so MCA shall be blamed !that's the democracy rule.

Leaving is a method but not a token ? Sorry,I don't practise 'tai chi',I only do muai thai and TKD.drive safe.
energygiver said :
2009年2月5日 下午6:29
Sabahan:
I really hate those jumping frogs either from PR to BN or BN to PR. The Perak case is similar to Sabah case in year 1994. I was very angry, frustrated and disappointed at that time and now I think the Perakian also.
Now, is the best time for all Malaysian to think what is our future with this kind of politician/leader/assemblymen? Jumping frog is going to become our culture soon!! Anwar, please stop taking member from BN any more. Opposition, please show your good result for those state governed by you. For the next election, BN will BE END!!!
Lin Peh said :
2009年2月5日 下午8:57
Maybe your OTK president will be claiming credit for the entire Perak drama ! HAHAHA!
愚公移山 said :
2009年2月5日 下午9:47
好文章!
吴启聪 said :
2009年2月6日 上午5:28
霹雳行动党的确有必要检讨自己问题出在哪里。

先有许月凤跳槽,后有冯宝君呛声,倪氏兄弟的帐还赖得了吗?

行动党如果不自己开一个缺口出来,教国阵怎么攻得进去?

怪别人无耻之前,倒不如先检讨自己的无能。
阿土伯 said :
2009年2月6日 下午12:02
我反对国阵以这种手段夺权,并不代表我是民联的成员。

我反对民联以挖角方式夺取中央政权,并不代表我穿着马华或民政的党服。

立场要分明,要勇敢表达及站稳立场。民青表达了,马青呢?没有。我们的霹雳州马医生还笑着睡,盼望当上十拿九稳的行政议员职呢。

他有没有站在华人的立场想过华人失去的是什么?华人失去的有多少?马医生,下届大选祝你好运!

真令人失望。
Zorgen said :
2009年2月6日 下午2:30
Nice article and well said! When I voted for PR for the last GE, my hope was PR could win and reminding all Malaysian that we are the boss. I don't expect PR government could bring any real improvement in Malaysia e.g. eliminating corruption, better rule of law, better separation of power etc. I hope that by demonstrating the people could decide who to be the government, many real Wakil Rakyat who put people interest above everything will raise up and form a brand new party which is built based on fairness, focus on people and country's interest as the principle of the party. Existing parties in Malaysia are equally the same in the way that they are formed to protect the interest of a subset of Malaysian. E.g. UMNO mainly for Malay; PKR was built based on revenge or for those can't continue to stay in UMNO; PAS was based on religion etc.

Anyway, I always believe that whatever that happened is for a better future. E.g. even normal people who didn't care much about politic are paying more attention on what is happening now.
oic said :
2009年2月6日 下午2:33
energygiver,

I am from KK,the current Perak disgusting drama also remind me what happen in Sabah during 1994,seems like $$$ is the almighty,I wish "moral" won't become a word only exist in history text book in future.

wu chi chong,

$$$ cause the defection of that bitch,that DAP cousin brothers only an excuse for her,or she has already screwed them during the press conference,there are so many MCA guys like u also not syiok with OTK,but PR is too poor to offer anything.
陈桂生 said :
2009年2月7日 上午1:19
是谁由始至终都反对‘青蛙文化’ ?是谁不断强调设立‘反跳槽法令’ 的重要性?当安华说916变天时,是谁变得满腹道德批判不是,却忘了自己过去几十年来也拉拢了对方不少的‘叛徒?现在霹雳州变天了,满腹道德也随之一拉跟着屎坑冲走,还大开门户招降纳叛。这片照妖镜果然把大妖魔给照出来了。可惜人家好像还越照越爽。如此没有立场原则的机会主义政党恐怕下届大选后就要变成恐龙了。
把自己看成是马来西亚唯一为华人争取权益的政党未免也自视过高了。民联执政几个月就弄了个马华50年来都争取不到的永久地契还不让自称’ 百万政党‘汗颜?
人家傻仔也傻得有立场,你不但不摆立场还小人度君子之腹。没有立场当然好,好在可以左右逢源。这招翁老总是华山第一大圆滑头。小的自然学得几招。
自己勾引别人老婆还要怪人家夫妻不合所以才有机可趁。人家是应该检讨,那你就应该浸猪笼。这种打家劫舍后,还沾沾自喜的说是保安系统做的不好,是强盗行为。
这次你赢的只是糖果,可是你输的是3年后的江山!
悲哉!悲哉!

Related Posts with Thumbnails